Team Evaluation	Evaluator Name:__________________

Evaluate yourself and your fellow team members from the course project.  Be as specific as possible in the space allotted.  Evaluations should be uploaded to the digital dropbox in Blackboard by Monday, March 15 at 2:10pm.  

Self evaluation:  
1.	List each of your MAJOR personal accomplishments/jobs on your team project this quarter. You may describe [some of] them in detail if you feel it's appropriate or useful. 

2.	Assign yourself a project grade (choices are: A, B, C, F) for your TEAM PROJECT ONLY.  Do not consider reading, homework, and lab assignments; this grade is just for your contributions to the team project. 
Grade:___ 

Self evaluation:  Underline and bold one entry in each line
	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither agree nor disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Don't know	
I have a good understanding of our project as a whole. 	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
I understood what my teammates were doing during this project.	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
I made significant contributions to our project.	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
Others were aware of my tasks and task status.	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
I produced high quality project artifacts.	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
I was a reliable and responsible team member.	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
Each member of my team contributed equally to the project. 	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
I understand the technologies used in our system.	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
I enjoyed working on this project.	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
I would like to continue working on this project.	1	2	3	4	5	Na	

Peer evaluations:  Complete for each project team member.  Underline and bold one entry in each line.

Name:
	poor	Below average	average	Above average	Great	Na	
Communication - participation in group meetings, keeping group members up to date on work status	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
reliability - does tasks on time	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
quality of work product	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
willingness to do fair share (or more) of the work	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
team player - able to compromise and think win-win	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
technical contribution	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
Overall grade relative to the rest of the team	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
Comments, special issues both good and bad:

 
Name:
	poor	Below average	average	Above average	Great	Na	
Communication - participation in group meetings, keeping group members up to date on work status	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
reliability - does tasks on time	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
quality of work product	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
willingness to do fair share (or more) of the work	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
team player - able to compromise and think win-win	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
technical contribution	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
Overall grade relative to the rest of the team	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
Comments, special issues both good and bad:

 
Name:
	poor	Below average	average	Above average	Great	Na	
Communication - participation in group meetings, keeping group members up to date on work status	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
reliability - does tasks on time	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
quality of work product	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
willingness to do fair share (or more) of the work	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
team player - able to compromise and think win-win	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
technical contribution	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
Overall grade relative to the rest of the team	1	2	3	4	5	Na	
Comments, special issues both good and bad: