Student Evaluation of CSC 300 presentation

Please use a scale of 0 though 5 for each metric.  0 is unacceptable,  5 is really exceptional.  A score of 2 is fair, 3 is good, 4 is very good.  Please only assign a 5 when it really strikes you as exceptional work.  By the same token, only assign a 0 or a 1 when the student performs very poorly.

Time contraint: Talk for 8 minutes or less, Q&A for 2 minutes or less.

1.     Eye contact and speaking style.  Eye contact, comfortable style?  Speaking clearly and loud enough?   


        _____________  

2.     Quality of slides.  Do the slides help organize the talk and add to your understanding of the topic?  Do they distract from the talk itself?  


        _____________

3.    Presentation of FACTS in an unbiased manner.  Do you get a good idea of the state of the world in the area?  Are facts presented so that you could go and check them if you were interested?


        _____________

4.    Statement of a narrow, focused issue for resolution.  Does the issue "pop out" of the fact recitation?  Do you understand exactly what question the presenter is asking?


        _____________

5.     Coverage of alternative arguments.  Have alternate arguments been covered in a fair manner and attributed so that you could trace them if you were interested?  


        _____________

6.    Use of ethical principles and ethical analysis to come to a reasoned conclusion.  Does the presenter answer her own question?  Do you (even if you disagree) understand and respect the reasoning behind the presenter's conclusion?


        _____________


Now, please add up your scores to give an overall evaluation (add each of your 6 scores above, maximum of 30 points total):



TOTAL  _____________