CPE/CSC 484 | User-Centered Interface Design and Development | Presentation Feedback | Documentation Feedback | ||
Presenters | Evaluators | Evaluators | |||
Topic | Date | Date | |||
Presentation Evaluation | |||||
Criterion | Note | Evaluation | Remarks | Evaluation | Remarks |
(0-5) | (0-5) | ||||
Knowledge of subject | Be an expert or at least act like an expert. | ||||
Appropriateness of subject | The topic should fit within the material we cover in the course and the content of the talk should address the topic. | ||||
Evidence | Does speaker convince audience with statistics and examples? Don't speak in generalities; such a talk is usually quite dull. | ||||
Organization | Have a clear thesis; delivery should consist of a few clearly defined points presented in a logical manner. Emphasize key points. Do not spend too much time on minor points. | ||||
Coverage | Within the defined limits of your talk, make sure you don't leave out key points of the topic. | ||||
Accuracy | If you are not sure of the accuracy of what you present, make it clear that it is a guess. Better yet, don't say it. | ||||
Delivery | Deliver with enthusiasm; keep the audience awake and interested. Maintain eye contact. Speak in whole sentences. | ||||
Audience Interest | Talk about something the audience wants to hear. | ||||
Timing | Not too long. | ||||
Not too short. | |||||
Not rushed and not lethargic. | |||||
Structure | For short speeches: | ||||
Attention getter | |||||
Problem statement | |||||
Solution | |||||
Clincher | |||||
To avoid | Reading your slides verbatim (use as notes to expand on) | ||||
Slides with too much info | |||||
Using slides that are not preapproved | |||||
Speaking too softly | |||||
Overall Evaluation | |||||
Acknowledgement: Developed by a group in Prof. Stearns Fall 97 CSC 300 class, with some modifications by Prof. Dana. Adopted with further modifications by Franz J. Kurfess in Winter 2003 and 2005. |