> Here are some notes. >
> The scheduling system automatically figures out if the current user is the > leader of one or more of the groups (??or individuals??) listed in the > attendees list, and if so prompts with a confirmation that asks if the meeting > should be penciled in on those users' calendars. >
> I'm thinking that we may want to keep it simple here and only allow pencil-in > when meetings are scheduled for registered groups. So here's a plausible rule: > in the confirmation dialog, the following information/questions are included: > (1) You are a leader of the following group(s) whose attendence you've > requested; do you want to pencil-in for them? (2) You do not have pencil-in > authority over the following user/group calendars: ... ; do you want to send > email notices announcing the meeting to these users? (3) the following > individually listed attendees are also in one or more of the listed groups: ... > ; the pencil-in or email notice will be done only once for these users. >
> Also note that the dialog for scheduling a meeting is quite similar to
> scheduling an appointment. In particular, the following fields are exactly the
> same in both dialogs: Title, Recurring, Category, Priority, Location.
5a35,39
>
>
> 2.5.1. Simple Case
>
>
6a41,60
>
>
> 2.5.2. Detailed Case
>
>
>
>
>
> 2.5.3. Changing and Deleting Group Meetings
>
>
>
> Basically, the same rules should apply as for individual meetings > > (see Section 2.4.6), > > but with the wider-ranging consequences of having to notify all > participants. > >